Which approach avoids undue influence in submissions?

The approach that avoids undue influence in submissions is based on the principle of impartiality. When proposals are created with an impartial stance, they are developed without favoritism or bias toward any party involved. This ensures that decisions are made based on objective criteria and fair evaluation rather than emotional appeals or personal interests.

Impartial proposals allow stakeholders to evaluate the information based on its inherent merit and relevance to the matter at hand. This creates a transparent process that fosters trust and integrity, crucial elements in condominium management where various parties may have differing interests and views.

In contrast, biased assessments can lead to favoritism, unverified claims could introduce misinformation, and uninformed decisions stem from a lack of proper data or understanding. These alternatives fail to uphold the integrity essential for fair submissions, thus increasing the risk of undue influence.